In the world of professional sports, athletes like Shawn Armstrong, a relief pitcher for the Texas Rangers, are often caught in a whirlwind of career highs and lows, and their journey is marked by a constant battle between performance and the harsh realities of contract negotiations. As a free agent after a standout 2025 season, Armstrong is seeking the stability that has eluded him throughout his career. However, this season of success may not be enough to guarantee him a long-term contract with the Rangers. His situation presents a window into the business dynamics of Major League Baseball (MLB) and the challenge players face in balancing athletic performance with the financial considerations of their teams.
In 2025, Armstrong posted a career-best season, pitching a career-high 74 innings with an impressive 2.31 ERA. For any pitcher, this would be seen as a career-defining achievement, yet for Armstrong, who has already played for four different teams in the past two seasons alone, the question remains: Can this stellar performance secure him the contract he desires? The right-hander’s consistency throughout his career has been anything but certain. While his numbers in 2025 were outstanding, his previous seasons have fluctuated significantly, showing both brilliance and inconsistency. This unpredictable pattern is what makes him a risky but potentially rewarding asset for any team looking to bolster their bullpen.
Armstrong’s pitching mechanics and statistics from 2025—such as his 26.1% strikeout rate and a respectable 7% walk rate—point to a solid performance, but there are caveats. His swinging-strike rate of 10.3% and opponents’ chase rate of 23.3% suggest that his dominance at the plate may not be sustainable, especially given the volatility in these key metrics. While his ERA is undeniably impressive, there is concern that his ability to continue getting batters to miss the ball could regress. This uncertainty often causes teams to approach free-agent pitchers like Armstrong with caution, weighing their immediate performance against the risk of future decline.
Despite these concerns, Armstrong’s track record of delivering consistent innings—he’s pitched at least eight MLB frames in each of the past 11 seasons—puts him in the category of reliable bullpen arms, even if he hasn’t yet fully established himself as a long-term fixture with any one team. His career ERA stands at 3.82 over 421 1/3 innings, a solid figure that reflects his overall value as a reliever. Still, his fluctuating yearly performance—such as the impressive 1.83 ERA in 2023, followed by a subpar 4.86 ERA in 2024—adds a layer of complexity to his free agency. The fact that Armstrong has been able to maintain a decent overall ERA despite these ups and downs speaks to his resilience, but it also highlights the uncertainty surrounding his future.
For the Texas Rangers, the decision to retain Armstrong comes at a critical juncture. The team has been actively rebuilding its bullpen over the past offseason and has found success with short-term, low-risk contracts. However, with Armstrong’s excellent 2025 performance, the question arises: Will they be willing to commit to a more substantial contract, or will they opt for a more conservative approach, offering another short-term deal? The Rangers have already seen the benefits of one-year contracts in recent seasons, securing notable players like Chris Martin and Hoby Milner. These moves have helped solidify the bullpen but also left the Rangers in a position where nearly their entire bullpen will hit free agency again, including Armstrong.
For Armstrong, this represents a critical moment in his career. After years of bouncing between teams, he has found a level of success with the Rangers that he hopes will lead to more than just a temporary stay. His performance in 2025, which includes impressive numbers across the board, may be enough to warrant a multi-year deal with the team. However, the financial reality for the Rangers complicates matters. With the Rangers acknowledging that payroll is expected to decrease, it’s unclear if Armstrong’s price tag will align with their budgetary constraints. The team’s recent moves, such as trading Marcus Semien’s remaining contract for Brandon Nimmo, indicate that the Rangers are trying to manage their payroll more carefully, making it even harder for Armstrong to secure the long-term deal he seeks.
If Armstrong is indeed looking for a two-year deal, similar to what former Rangers reliever Phil Maton signed with the Cubs, his chances of securing that contract may be slim. Maton’s two-year, $14.5 million deal is on the higher end of what the Rangers are likely willing to spend. While Armstrong’s 2025 performance was stellar, his history of inconsistency might make it difficult for the Rangers to justify such a commitment, especially as they face competing financial priorities.
This situation highlights the larger trend in MLB, where players like Armstrong must navigate the delicate balance between performance and long-term job security. For free agents, especially those who have not yet solidified themselves as top-tier players, the offseason often becomes a waiting game. They must rely on their past performances, which can be subject to scrutiny and second-guessing, to convince teams that they are worth the risk. Players who have shown flashes of brilliance but lack consistent performance often find themselves in the position Armstrong is in, where a great season may not be enough to guarantee a contract, let alone a long-term commitment.
The volatility of Armstrong’s career mirrors the broader uncertainty many professional athletes face. While a player can have an excellent season, like Armstrong’s 2025 campaign, the financial realities of the sport often take precedence. Teams must consider not just a player’s recent performance but also their long-term potential, and Armstrong’s career trajectory—one marked by inconsistency—may make it difficult for the Rangers to make a long-term commitment. In this respect, Armstrong’s journey as a free agent serves as a reminder of how professional sports are often shaped by business decisions rather than just athletic performance.
As the offseason progresses, Armstrong’s fate remains uncertain. While his career-best 2025 numbers make him a strong candidate for any team’s bullpen, whether the Rangers will meet his asking price is unclear. His situation is a testament to the complex nature of free agency in professional sports, where success on the field does not always translate into job security. For Armstrong, the challenge is not just proving he’s capable on the mound but also showing that he can be a long-term, reliable asset for a team looking to balance success and financial responsibility.
This offseason will ultimately determine if Armstrong can break free from the cycle of short-term contracts that have defined his career and find the stability he has long sought. Whether he stays with the Rangers or moves on to another team, his story will be another chapter in the larger narrative of the ever-changing nature of professional sports contracts, where performance and financial constraints often collide in complex and unpredictable ways.
About the Author
